Skip to content

Explore the relationships.

Discover how structural connections can change the way a stakeholder environment is understood.

Select a node to highlight its direct connections. Switch between graph and table to see how the same information tells different stories.

Illustrative data: fictional actors and connections
Actors
14
Links
20
Groups
2
Links between groups
1
Density
0.2220 of 91 possible links
Modularity
0.45
  • Cluster A
  • Cluster B
  • Link between groups
  • Strongest bridging position
  • Larger node = more direct connections
  • Screen distance carries no meaning
A01A02A03A04A05A06A07A08A09A10A11A12A13A14
  1. Evidence

    In a real audit, each link comes from a record: a joint program, a documented meeting, a shared agreement. Here, every link is invented.

  2. Relationship

    Each record becomes a connection between two actors. This example has 20 connections among 14 actors.

  3. Pattern

    Two groups of fictional actors, joined by one link: A07–A08.

    If coordination between the groups depends on a single relationship, that relationship is a potential bottleneck.

  4. Decision

    Validate whether the A07–A08 link is current and well evidenced, then decide whether to strengthen it or build a second connection between the groups.

Understand the network behind your challenge.

Tell us what is difficult to see in your stakeholder environment. We will explore the question, the information you have and whether an Influence Audit is the right approach.